| Current Time: | Add to Favorites | Add As Home Page |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sportsbetting 101
Most express it as a percentage. In this case, for spread betting, it is 4.545%. To compare to some popular casino gambling games, the vig in craps is approx. 1/72 (1.389%) and in roulette gambling it is 2/38 (5.26%) on a double zero wheel. It is a representation of the house's long term betting edge over time based on the mathematics of the game. Each and every gambling strategy has this "vig" inherent in it, barring a push. In order for a bettor to win, he must win an adjusted percentage high enough to overcome or counteract this vig. For spread betting, at typical "lay prices" of -110 each way, that magic number is 52.38%. This break even percentage is what you need to surpass long term to win. One interesting side note is that the farther away from even a money sports betting line goes, if the differential is held constant, the less vig is inherent. That is, the sports book is skimming a higher percentage of the players' money (assuming balanced action) on sports betting lines of -110/-110 than -130/+110, -160/+140, etc. This is why books have "break points" along the way where the differential is increased. So it might be a 20 cent differential up to -149/+129, then a 30 cent differential up to -199/+169, then 40 cents, etc. A place like Canbet is a little unusual in that it keeps the vig percentage constant, so the differential expands gradually, making all the sport bedding odds along the way identically favorable (except for slight rounding) to the -110/-110 starting point (-107/-107 for some sports). I can see the fairness in this, but obviously a bettor would prefer keeping the differential constant, as something like -200/+180 odds carries with it very little vig. Patton: Buckeye: If everyone at the table bets "10" and "10" hits and everyone leaves, the house's profit on that spin isn't 5.26%, obviously. Nor if the same situation happens and the spin is instead "0" and everyone loses is the house's profit 5.26%. But the vig is the expected long term mathematical betting edge, assuming balanced action, not the actual profit of one particular spin. It is based on the fact that if you played all 38 numbers every spin, you would lose 2/38 of everything bet. Think about it as if you were sport betting on both sides of the same game, at the same spread betting line. You'd be sacrificing 1/22 and giving the book the vig. Some do this when they make a mistake and accidentally bet the wrong side, or if they change their mind before kickoff and want to get out of the bet. This is called "juicing out" of the bet. You sacrifice the juice, that is, pay the vig. Vig determines the book's theoretical edge, rather than actual one, because a book's actual profits are affected by unbalanced action, money bet on both sides of line moves (by scalpers or middlers possibly), etc. It depends on the actual skill and policies of the book's linesmakers and managers. I did read in one Vegas report that Vegas's take on football betting is closer to 5%, partly based on teasers and parlays and possibly the many square tourists that bet there, while their take on basketball betting is closer to 2.5%, and on baseball betting their take is smaller still.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Majorwager is part of the Major Network Best View: 1024 by 768 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||