Go Back   MajorWager Forums > MW - Online Sportsbooks > Pit Lane
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2003, 06:05 PM
jlpblade jlpblade is offline
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,882
Default Stewart goes to backup car

FORT WORTH, Texas -- In an unprecedented move Friday, NASCAR officials disallowed defending Winston Cup champion Tony Stewart's primary car from competing in Sunday's Samsung/RadioShack 500 at Texas Motor Speedway.

Tony Stewart Credit: Autostock

The car, which had not yet been used by the team, was confiscated by NASCAR and its backup, another unused chassis according to Joe Gibbs Racing team manager Jimmy Makar, was pulled out of the transporter in its place.

"I'm not sure we ever have done this," NASCAR president Mike Helton said.

NASCAR impounded the car and planned to return it to its technical and research and development facility in Concord, N.C., to investigate it further.

"The uniqueness of this action comes from a great deal of action by NASCAR, the race teams and moving to the common body locations and the new templates, to eliminate the exoticness of the cars," Helton said. "This is the first case of a car being outside the box that was built for them.

"The effort by John (Darby, Winston Cup director), the teams and the body shops has been a success -- on the race track, in the garage area and from the car owners concerning the economics of the sport, so we have a high level of interest in keeping it in that direction."

Stewart off to good start, on and off the track

Stewart looks to Atlanta when talking about Texas

Makar said the original No. 20 Monte Carlo failed the "X measurement" test, which is one method of determining a car's body placement in relation to the centerline of the chassis.

"It's a measurement from the corners of the decklid up to the corners of the roof, across the back glass," Makar said. "In the X they look for offsets to the car and the measurement was bigger than what they told us they were going to allow."

Makar said the discrepancy, which he cited a half-inch, could not easily be corrected at the race track, so the back-up car was taken off the hauler.

"Why it was bigger, we're not really sure yet," Makar said. "We build every car the same, but that car, for whatever reason, showed a little bit bigger.

"It's not so much a case of body mounting points as it looks at offsets at different points of the car, from the roof to the decklid. What it's designed for is to keep you from offsetting the decklid way over to the right."

Helton said a determination of any advantage the car might have had would be determined at the R&D center.

"We have taken it to keep it in that condition and to investigate further rather than have them (team) cut it up," Helton said. "The resources of the R&D center give us the ability to understand things. We'll take it back to the R&D center and determine more about this situation."
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2003, 06:53 PM
Dr.Chau Dr.Chau is offline
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,260

That's crazy, they impounded his car
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2003, 03:19 PM
Docwatson Docwatson is offline
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 672

The thing that's so fishy to me about the whole thing is that their backup car is the car they ran at Atlanta, and finished well. Why bring that in as a backup, or even yet have it as a backup unless you think you may get caught doing something different with the one for the main race at Texas???
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2003, 03:45 PM
Crony Crony is offline
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,037


Why wouldn't you have your 2nd best car for a track as a backup?
There are other ways to lose your primary.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2003, 03:03 AM
Docwatson Docwatson is offline
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 672

That's just it. His backup for this race wasn't his second best car it is his best car for this type of track..His backup he has to race now was a car that he ran at Atlanta finishing 5th just a few weeks ago which is the sister track here at Texas. No reason at all for them to bring out a different ride for this race unless they had a definite edge with it. Which they did all be it an illegal one, and they got caught. Even though they lose this car they still had a very good one to fall back on just in case plan number one failed. They took a chance, and got busted, but yet they still have a good ride for this weekend. In my opinion no way they mis-calculate that much at the shop, and never catch it till it gets to the inspection area. They'll blame it on the guys back home, and make it sound real good an all. NASCAR guys are always trying to get a slight edge it's always been the nature of this sport.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2003, 02:28 PM
cecil cecil is offline
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,433

Great post Doc...
Player Advocate
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Please be advised that if you are wagering over the internet, this is illegal in many jurisdictions. A wagering site may be operating legally at their location but it may still be illegal for you to wager from your location. We suggest you check on the legal situation from any jurisdiction in which you may wager.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6