![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Mess Hall Online Sportsbook Discussion |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| Empire Online sues PartyGaming for 'substantial damages' 12.06.2005, 05:27 AM LONDON (AFX) - Online gaming firm Empire Online Ltd said it is seeking 'substantial damages' and injunctive relief in a Gibraltar court from rival PartyGaming PLC, owner of the world's biggest online poker site. Cyprus-based Empire Online filed the lawsuit in Gibraltar, where PartyGaming is based. Sources close to the situation say Empire is seeking 'several hundred million US dollars' in damages after PartyGaming separated the poker system used by its own players from that used by partner companies such as Empire. Empire is understood to be effectively demanding that the contract, which PartyGaming scrapped, be re-instated. Empire shares have lost three quarters of their value in the past three months. Shares in the company which was worth as much as 840 mln stg at the height of the boom in online gaming shares, were first hit after PartyGaming warned of a slowdown in revenue growth at the beginning of September. The stock was further rocked after PartyGaming in October effectively attempted to cut its reliance on the likes of Empire for the generation of new custom. So-called skins such as Empire earn the bulk of their revenue by driving new punters to third parties' gambling platforms, in return for a share of the profit. Empire says the switch by PartyGaming, its biggest client, was in breach of contract. But PartyGaming, which shortly after scrapped an attempt to buy Empire, denies that. Spokesman John Shepherd said PartyGaming remains 'highly confident of a successful outcome' to the litigation. 'I note that Empire put pantomime tickets up for sale this morning and I won't be buying any,' Shepherd said, pouring scorn on the lawsuit. PartyGaming is understood to have sent a letter to Empire on May 4, spelling out its intention to shift players to the new platform, sparked off a lengthy series of correspondence between the two groups. Sources close to the situation say Empire, which made no mention of the impending changes in its listing prospectus, was taken by surprise at the suddenness of the decision. Empire Online shares nudged up 0.5 pence to 71 by 10.08 am, valuing the company at around 208 mln stg, while PartyGaming stock slipped 2.25 pence to 115.5, valuing the business at 4.6 bln stg. |
| |||
| Definition of frivelous lawsuit. Unless UK contact law is much different than ours. I just find it disgusting beyond belief that they cannot equitably split the hundreds of millions of dollars they are making. I never quite got the whole empire business plan, gaming titan with no proprietary platform in anything. But I am sure they contributed some to party's bottomline, although I know of no one who was a empire customer before being a Party customer.
__________________ In 1998 the Department of Justice brought charges under the Wire Act against 22 American citizens involved in managing foreign-based sites. "You can’t hide online," Janet Reno, the attorney-general, warned Internet betting operators, "and you can’t hide offshore." |
| |||
| i was lucky to get accounts at both sites before they put the clamps down...empire been offerning 100% bonus up to $100 the last 2months (got to play 1000raked)...i hope they continue to offer this great promo...they will get my action every time.... "I just find it disgusting beyond belief that they cannot equitably split the hundreds of millions of dollars they are making." ...fwiw i couldnt agree more... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() | |