ONLINE SPORTSBOOKS

Go Back   MajorWager Forums > MW - Online Sportsbooks > Mess Hall
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Mess Hall Online Sportsbook Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2008, 08:16 AM
Uncle B Uncle B is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: denial
Posts: 48,018
Default Damp, miserable, uncomfortable --- it's not the weather, it's the Browns







Quote:

Not this lost season, where the Browns aren't just 4-8 after Sunday's 10-6 loss to the Colts.

They are 1-6 at home.

It wasn't just the dishwater gray skies, the dismal drizzle and about 20,000 empty orange seats that led to the general gloom hanging over the franchise. It's that the fans can't even watch Brady Quinn (broken finger), who is out for the season, while Derek Anderson went down with a knee injury with 1:07 left in the game.

"It didn't look good, I'm not encouraged," said coach Romeo Crennel.

Suddenly, we're in the Ken Dorsey Era? Crennel said he may be starting next week at Tennessee. This is ridiculous, especially for the fans who have been investing so many dollars and so much of their emotional bank accounts into this franchise. If you're a Browns fan and you're mad, no one can blame you. If you're a Browns fan and you suddenly don't care anyone -- that also is a reasonable reaction, but it's one that should scare Owner Randy Lerner.

Such a reaction explains all those empty seats in the fourth quarter of last week's 16-6 loss to Houston, and how they remained vacant from the opening kickoff of Sunday's game. The Browns have become such a disappointment, that people who bought tickets don't even bother to show up -- and sometimes, can't even give them away.

A year ago, the team was 10-6 overall, a stunning 7-1 at home and truly appeared to give the customers some reason to believe that 2008 would at least be, what?

Interesting? Entertaining?

Instead, we have this.

A team that is 4-8 and didn't get here by accident. On Sunday, it was a team with nothing to lose, yet it played not to lose. Running back Jamal Lewis complained about the play calling of offensive Rob Chudzinski after the Houston loss. So Lewis went from 10 carries to 24 on Sunday, but it wasn't working as he gained a mere 77 yards (3.2 average).

Running the ball against the Colts is a good idea, as they ranked 25th defending the rush. But Lewis seemed slow to hit the holes, and had trouble breaking loose.


Remember Jerome Harrison, the backup averaging 8.8 yards per carry? The guy who has had runs of 12, 72 and 16 yards in each of the last three games -- with a total of 15 carries for 159 yards?

Well, forget him. At least the Browns did.

Harrison carried the ball twice in the first half (six total yards), and never touched it again after the half. Maybe he was on the field in the final two quarters, but I never noticed him.

What I did see was Chudzinski worried about Anderson throwing an interception, so he called for one short pass after another. It was a game plan more suited to a mid-range passer such as Quinn than a long-bomber like Anderson.

Yes, running was the best approach. Yes, going for broke through the air against the Colts is difficult, because they have allowed only four touchdown passes all season. But Anderson threw so many short passes -- and let's face it, his touch on those is often shaky.

Despite a game plan determined to prevent Anderson from making a game-deciding mistake, he still did that when he was sacked with 9:45 left, fumbled and the Colts' Rob Mathis picked up the ball and ran 37 yards for the only touchdown of the game.

Crennel said he considered challenging, that Anderson may have been throwing the ball as he fumbled -- and the pass would be ruled incomplete. But the coach said word from the coaches in the press box was that the play looked like a fumble.

Suddenly a 6-3 lead became a 10-6 loss.

The Browns have not scored a touchdown in their last two home games. They have scored only two touchdowns in the third quarter all season. They entered the day ranking 29th in scoring in the red zone, and this day certainly didn't change that distressing statistic.

In five of 12 games this season, the Browns have scored fewer than 12 points. They entered the day ranked 27th on offense, and at least some of that has to be blamed on the coaching.

The frustrating part of this season is identical 10-6 losses at home to Pittsburgh and Indianapolis. At 1-6, they are on their way to one of their worst home records ever -- they were 0-8 at home in the expansion year of 1999, but at least Chris Palmer's team beat Pittsburgh, 16-15, on the road.

The Browns have one more home game -- Dec. 21 against the toothless Bengals. But there may be more than a few good seats available.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2008, 12:14 PM
Pancho Sanza Pancho Sanza is offline
Three Star General
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,238
Default

At least they covered.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2008, 12:26 PM
stevo stevo is offline
Five Star General
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 64,188
Default

By the hooker live
__________________
May the odds be ever in your favor.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2008, 11:23 PM
Uncle B Uncle B is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: denial
Posts: 48,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pancho Sanza View Post
At least they covered.


Gonna be interesting to see how they fare next week....Man, they are beaten to shit.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cleveland/KC --weather is damp and chilly BuzzRavanaugh Mess Hall 2 06-05-2007 10:07 PM
I'm beginning to feel a bit uncomfortable..... TOW Mess Hall 2 07-19-2004 10:29 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Please be advised that if you are wagering over the internet, this is illegal in many jurisdictions. A wagering site may be operating legally at their location but it may still be illegal for you to wager from your location. We suggest you check on the legal situation from any jurisdiction in which you may wager.
 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6