ONLINE SPORTSBOOKS

Go Back   MajorWager Forums > MW - Online Sportsbooks > Mess Hall
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Mess Hall Online Sportsbook Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2008, 10:22 AM
Rogthedodger Rogthedodger is offline
Editor-in-Chief, MajorWager.com
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,871
Default The Complete Square's Guide to Sports Wagering: Being Contrarian, Part I...By Jay Graziani

We often think of sports gambling as a battle of bettor versus bookie. However, that's not quite true, because betting lines are not static. If everyone is betting Team A at a line of -5, pretty soon the line will move to Team A -5.5, then Team A -6, and so on until a reasonable equilibrium is reached where betting interest starts to be generated (and money starts coming in) on their opponents. True, a linesmaker sets the opening line. But from there, the action is in the hands of the "market", all the players and sportsbooks collectively. When the normal balance goes askew due to a lot of "square money" on one side, "value" situations can arise.

A good comparison is the stock market. When everyone is optimistic and buying, prices rise, often causing the underlying stocks to become too expensive. Likewise, when the mood is pessimistic, stocks tend to become oversold. This is the old "fear and greed" dichotomy that seemingly defines the financial markets. And in general, those that have bucked the trends have been the most successful. In other words, if you want to make money, you should be buying when everyone else is selling, and selling when everyone else is buying. Buy in cold markets to pick up value, sell in hot markets where your investments are overpriced and you can receive more than they're fairly worth. This is an oversimplification, but a trend that mostly holds true.

The converse, buying when everyone else is also buying, means that you will likely pay too much for your investment because you are competing among a lot of other bidders who like that same investment - the old "supply and demand" conundrum. But in a cold market there is little competition to buy, and prices are lower since many want to sell. Therefore, you can make your purchase at a discount to "fair value". This same principal applies to sports betting. If you are betting the same team that everyone else is, you probably are paying too much for them, in the form of a line that is worse than deserved. Likewise, betting on teams that everyone else is scared to bet often earns you a slightly more generous line than normally warranted.

You can think of linesmaking as trying to accomplish one of two things: either balance out the sharp action with other sharp action on a game to hedge exposure, or instead balance the high-dollar sharp money with high-volume public money to cut downside risk. Since pro bettors will risk many times what a recreational gambler does, balancing the two sides is often difficult. In other words, sometimes the money will be evenly divided, with "sharps" on both sides, and public money making very little impact. Here the sharps define the market and the line is "fair value". Other times, the public money will become so overwhelming that the public drives the line and it becomes a battle of "sharps versus squares". Identifying these situations and siding with the "sharps" will tend to put luck on your side.

There are two conditions when the public money can offset wiseguy action. First, the event might attract enough squares to bring in the sheer volume of bets necessary to counteract the sharp wagers. This is the case for something like the NFL, which receives broad recreational wagering support, particularly on Monday Night Football and during the playoffs. The "MNF home underdog" angle held up for many years for this very reason.

The other situation where public money can overwhelm the market is when limits are kept low enough to minimize the damage the sharps can do. This situation applies to wagers like the UFC, which has decent public support combined with low limits, giving the average Joe more of a say in setting the market prices than in most sports. With $5000 bet limits, it takes 100 $50 bettors to balance one max wager from a sharp player. With $100 limits, it only takes two squares to neutralize that wiseguy. In other words, it is easier to counterbalance winning bettors when you severely cap the amount they can win per game, and this causes the lines to be biased towards "the public".

Contrarian strategy is not a golden goose. Ask anyone who played against the highly-favored Boston Celtics in the NBA finals, or those who faded the New England Patriots throughout the regular season at what seemed like over-inflated lines, only to watch the Pats go 10-6 against the spread (I am personally guilty on both counts). But patience is the contrarian's friend, and those same Patriots ended up going 0-3 ATS in the playoffs, when the stakes were higher. Indianapolis and Dallas also failed to cover a single game in the playoffs, despite being heavily favored (along with New England) in the futures lines.

The key to finding good contrarian situations is to be in tune with public perception surrounding players and teams. The teams everyone are betting hand-over-fist, the "can't lose locks", the teams on the highlight reels of Sportscenter, are the teams you should look to go against. The teams that everyone is scared to bet likely hold hidden value. In the next installment, I'll take a look at some specific strategies for incorporating contrarian wisdom in sports betting.

"The Complete Square's Guide to Sports Wagering" is a recurring series aimed at educating novice sports bettors. The next article will examine specific contrarian betting strategies.

7-25-08
Jay Graziani
MajorWager.com
graziani@majorwager.com

http://www.majorwager.com/frontline-680.html
__________________
Editor-in-Chief
MajorWager.com
editor@majorwager.com
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2008, 12:17 PM
sylf sylf is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,094
Default

"Ask anyone who played against the highly-favored Boston Celtics in the NBA finals"


Highly-favored????? The Lakers were the favorites. LOL!!!
__________________
Nobody had moves like Dwayne "Pearl" Washington
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:35 PM
drunkguy drunkguy is offline
MW Mod & Writer, Jay Graziani
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 8,678
Send a message via MSN to drunkguy Send a message via Yahoo to drunkguy
Default

ooops...


I meant it to refer to the attitude about the celtics throughout the season and during the rest of the playoffs (prior to the finals)...but probably not the best example anyway
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2008, 12:10 PM
stevo stevo is offline
Five Star General
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 64,180
Default

This is the old "fear and greed" dichotomy that seemingly defines the financial markets.

Give me that fear baby. Thats why I want to see 10k on dow and if it hits that some fear selling will come in. Creating exactly what Jay is talking about.
__________________
May the odds be ever in your favor.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Complete Square's Guide to Sports Wagering: Correlated Parlays...By Jay Graziani Rogthedodger Mess Hall 4 06-18-2008 12:27 AM
The Complete Square's Guide to Sports Wagering: Significance of Win-Loss Records.By J. Graziani Rogthedodger Mess Hall 13 06-04-2008 05:20 AM
The Complete Square's Guide to Sports Wagering: The Kelly Criterion...By Jay Graziani Rogthedodger Mess Hall 4 04-22-2008 02:50 AM
The Complete Square's Guide to Sports Wagering: Money Management...By Jay Graziani Rogthedodger Mess Hall 7 04-01-2008 07:33 PM
The Complete Square's Guide to Sports Wagering: Basic Strategies...By Jay Graziani Rogthedodger Mess Hall 10 02-28-2008 10:36 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48 AM.

Please be advised that if you are wagering over the internet, this is illegal in many jurisdictions. A wagering site may be operating legally at their location but it may still be illegal for you to wager from your location. We suggest you check on the legal situation from any jurisdiction in which you may wager.
 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6