WASHINGTON POST: As Super Bowl Looms, FBI Eyes Online Wagering

[clevfan]

Crashing the Party
As Super Bowl Looms, FBI Eyes Online Wagering

By Carrie Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 3, 2007; D01



If the U.S. government gets its way on Super Bowl Sunday, all bets will be off -- all online bets, that is.

Federal prosecutors and agents in the FBI's organized crime unit have been mounting a large-scale crackdown on Internet gambling, with indictments against executives at gaming Web sites, arrests of foreign businessmen who process payments, and subpoenas to investment banks that may have helped bankroll the operations.

The aggressive campaign has gathered steam in recent weeks, as Americans prepare to wager more than $5 billion on tomorrow's game between the Chicago Bears and the Indianapolis Colts, the biggest betting day of the year, according to industry experts.

The arrests in California and in the U.S. Virgin Islands last month of two board members of Neteller, a British company that facilitates online money transfers, is spurring overseas executives with even modest gambling connections to avoid traveling to the United States lest they be nabbed. And it is leaving legal analysts and bettors crying foul about the government's approach.

"This escalation or, no, we should say surge, in this war of intimidation Justice is waging right now really has had an effect," said I. Nelson Rose, a professor at Whittier Law School in California and author of a textbook on gambling law.

Justice Department officials have long been on record as saying that Internet gambling breaks the law. They cite the long-standing Wire Act, a statute making it a crime to use telephone lines to place a bet within the United States or overseas. The 1961 law, which applies to businesses instead of individual bettors, was designed to eradicate the Mafia from the gambling arena.

But after the 2000 wire-fraud conviction of sports betting entrepreneur Jay Cohen for operating a Web site in Antigua, federal prosecutors enforced it only sporadically. The campaign heated up last year, after the government indicted two popular sports betting Web sites: Antigua's WorldWide Telesports Inc., and London's BetOnSports PLC. Both companies have announced they will no longer accept wagers from U.S. clients.

Then Congress dealt in. At the last minute, lawmakers inserted an online-gaming measure into the port security bill that chokes the flow of money by barring the use of credit cards, checks and fund transfers to make and settle bets. President Bush signed the bill into law in October.

But it has been the wave of criminal charges against individual executives and businesses that prompted a real exodus from the U.S. market. Americans bet nearly $6 billion online in 2005, but the flood of public companies out of the country has made it difficult to estimate current amounts, said Eugene Christiansen, who tracks such spending.

Meanwhile, U.S. authorities show few, if any, signs of folding, even in the face of rulings by the World Trade Organization that the United States cannot put foreign rivals at an economic disadvantage on the Internet gambling issue.

"Criminal prosecutions related to online gambling will be pursued even in cases where assets and defendants are positioned outside of the United States," Michael J. Garcia, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, said last month.

Yet legal experts say there are questions about whether Internet gaming is a crime worthy of extradition in most foreign jurisdictions, and whether the executives meant to break the law, given that their operations are legal in their home countries.

Moreover, although the Justice Department has suggested that all forms of Internet gambling violate the law, analysts say that online horse racing, poker and fantasy leagues may be exempt. Gambling in some form, from state-sponsored lotteries to race tracks and slot machines, is legal in a majority of the 50 states, which collect billions in tax revenue from the enterprises each year.

A. Jeff Ifrah, a defense lawyer in the District office of Greenberg Traurig, said the Justice crackdown is confounding some legal analysts because "it is unclear how the government randomly targets members of this industry for prosecution, and why it is doing so on the heels of legislation that only recently prohibited facilitating certain gaming activity."

Neteller, which had provided payment services to more than 80 percent of worldwide gaming merchants, watched its business swell after PayPal and parent company eBay agreed to leave the business and forfeit $10 million to settle civil charges three years ago over financial transfers to offshore and online gambling firms.

Now, however, with the arrest of two of its founders, the British Web site is scrambling to exit the U.S business. Neteller is besieged with requests from frustrated bettors who want to recoup billions in deposits and winnings. The money is being held in trust accounts while the company holds conversations with the Justice Department about the status of its executives and other board members.

"The answer is, it's a bit confused at the moment," Neteller spokesman George Cazenove said. "I'm sure they will get their money back. You've got to give Neteller a bit of space."

Prosecutors have increased efforts to force advertising companies and Web sites to reject paid ads for Internet gambling sites. They also sent subpoenas to at least three investment banks, HSBC, Dresdner Kleinwort and Credit Suisse. Richard Lindsay, spokesman for HSBC, said the subpoena it received late last year requested information "pertaining to some Internet gambling companies."

The crackdown against public, regulated foreign businesses has left small private companies to fill the void, an issue that worries industry officials and consumer groups who say the smaller entities are less subject to oversight and more difficult to police. In essence, they argue, the government drive could turn into another prohibition, and have the perverse impact of fostering underground, illegal activity.

"The net effect of this is, responsible people are out of the business," said Frank J. Fahrenkopf Jr., president of the American Gaming Association, a casino industry trade group.

But federal officials disagree. Mark J. Mershon, FBI assistant director, last month cautioned that companies handling Americans' offshore bets "amount to a colossal criminal enterprise masquerading as legitimate business."

Staff writer Tomoeh Murakami Tse and staff researcher Richard Drezen contributed to this report.

[The Actuary]

THe support from the liberal toilet papers thus far has been incredibly dissappointing -this piece no exception although factually accurate it is missing the left wing lean.

[JC]

Originally Posted by The Actuary

this piece no exception although factually accurate

Actually I already wrote them and told them I wanted a retraction since I was not convicted of any kind of fraud.

Fact checking in the modern media is usually very lacking.

[Dell Dude]

Originally Posted by clevfan

Mark J. Mershon, FBI assistant director, last month cautioned that companies handling Americans' offshore bets "amount to a colossal criminal enterprise masquerading as legitimate business."

Takes one to know one, sir.

[The Actuary]

JC LOL I guessed I missed that!
By and large though it seems to be a pretty good article,
just wish there was a more liberal bent to it.

[pokerjoe]

Most of us grow up thinking the papers basically get things right. But then one day they cover a subject you know really well. And you see how horribly wrong they get it. And thereafter, you know to take coverage of all the subjects about which you know little, with a big ass grain of salt.

[(sportman)]

You nailed it again pokerjoe

[Highwayman]

But federal officials disagree. Mark J. Mershon, FBI assistant director, last month cautioned that companies handling Americans' offshore bets "amount to a colossal criminal enterprise masquerading as legitimate business."

ANY casino industry, banking system, state ran gaming monopoly, etc. could be viewed as “a colossal criminal enterprise masquerading as legitimate business.”




.