BETCRIS 5DIMES ACTION ON SPORTS BETPHOENIX.COM BODOG BOOKMAKER.COM HOLLYWOOD SPORTSBOOK INTERTOPS RACEBOOK SPORTSBETTING.COM WSEX
ONLINE SPORTSBOOKS Banner -<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://www.majorwager.com/adserver/adclick.php?bannerid=92&amp;zoneid=1&amp;source=&amp;dest=http%3A%2F%2Fsports.bodog.com%2Fwelcome%2F1404439%2F&amp;ismap='>Online Sports Betting</a>at Bodog Sportsbook

Go Back   MajorWager Forums > MW - Online Sportsbooks > Handicapping "Think Tank"
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Handicapping "Think Tank" technical handicapping and statistics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2006, 05:33 PM
blogguy blogguy is offline
MW Writer, S.H. Austin
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,635
Default WNBA standings through Thurs 5/31

I think it was Jackyl who noted the other day that the straight up winner had covered every game so far in the WNBA. That's still true. So, the standings also tell you the ATS record of every team. Figured I'd cut and paste the data in here since the standings are currently doing double duty!

Eastern Conference
Indiana 4 1
Connecticut 2 1
Detroit 2 1
Washington 2 1
Charlotte 1 2
Chicago 1 3
New York 0 3

Western Conference
Houston 3 1
Sacramento 3 1
Los Angeles 3 2
San Antonio 2 2
Seattle 2 2
Minnesota 1 3
Phoenix 0 3

Yzer, what do you think of putting together power ratings? Are those something you use...or do you just look at the matchups. I can' probably deduce some retro-fitted ones from the recent lines later today...then we can update as need be. Worth a shot?

Quick notes on the standings...New York and Phoenix are much worse than the oddsmakers seem to realize. They're not really getting close to their spreads. Even though everyone knows NY is horrible, they're still getting routed by monster margins.

Last year the lines never caught up to Sacramento and Connecticut. I think they were about 67% to cover when not playing each other (something like 48-24...I wrote it up somewhere but can't remember where). Interesting that both have continued to cover out of the gate this year.

I've been reading Chicago's boxscores just to see what Stacy Dales-Schuman was all about. Based on what's happened so far...she should have stayed with ESPN. Probably a bit rusty...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Please be advised that if you are wagering over the internet, this is illegal in many jurisdictions. A wagering site may be operating legally at their location but it may still be illegal for you to wager from your location. We suggest you check on the legal situation from any jurisdiction in which you may wager.
 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6