![]() | ![]() | |
| Handicapping "Think Tank" technical handicapping and statistics |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| How much would you risk on a true even money proposition (eg. coin flip) what % of bankroll... if that prop was paying a)+105 b)+120 c)+200 no scalping or hedging allowed. I just read mach's answer in this thread and it probably helps which of these 4 options is the best baseball bet thanks again. |
| |||
| Without adhering strictly to Mach's rule of thumb: a) $0...+2.5% edge makes me think the expected gain isn't worth the volatility. b) Maybe 2% of BR. c) Up to 5% of BR.
__________________ "Dan Marino? What did he play...kickball?" |
| |||
| Chucky how would your answer differ if the question was regarding sports bets and not coin flips?
__________________ In 1998 the Department of Justice brought charges under the Wire Act against 22 American citizens involved in managing foreign-based sites. "You can’t hide online," Janet Reno, the attorney-general, warned Internet betting operators, "and you can’t hide offshore." |
| |||
| TA: Obviously, like we've been discussing, it would clearly be a more conservative staking. Totally agree that there's a big difference when calculating odds on a closed system (coin flips, blackjack run on a super-computer) where replacement or true independent trials are part of the equation. Compare that to sports betting, where no matter how good you are, you're still banking on some pretty heavy assumptions. Regarding my answer above, I have to admit that I'm a pretty conservative player. The idea of tapping out an allocated bankroll is much more foul than the positive ramifications of turning over a tidy profit. Just my outlook on things. I could see how someone else would rationally be willing to risk bigger %s.
__________________ "Dan Marino? What did he play...kickball?" |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() | |