BETCRIS 5DIMES ACTION ON SPORTS BETPHOENIX.COM BODOG BOOKMAKER.COM HOLLYWOOD SPORTSBOOK INTERTOPS RACEBOOK SPORTSBETTING.COM WSEX
ONLINE SPORTSBOOKS Banner -<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://www.majorwager.com/adserver/adclick.php?bannerid=93&amp;zoneid=2&amp;source=&amp;dest=http%3A%2F%2Fsports.bodog.com%2Fwelcome%2F1404439%2F&amp;ismap='>Online Sports Betting</a>at Bodog Sportsbook

Go Back   MajorWager Forums > MW - Online Sportsbooks > Handicapping "Think Tank"
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Handicapping "Think Tank" technical handicapping and statistics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2002, 11:09 PM
Holy Bull Holy Bull is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,746
Default Success going against steam?

Since the Mess Hall is devoid of intelligence and gambling related topics the last few days...thought i'd ask this here...

Its pretty well known that getting steam at the original price will show a profit.

My question is:
Has anyone ever tried making a profit or analyzed the profit potential of strictly going against steam? Seems to me when chasers get out of control and books get antsy for buy back, you can get just as much value on the other side, provided you stay away from the high success rate steam sports like college basketball. Would be interested in what the data has to say though.
A system like this has a lot more appeal to me than staring at Don's Best all day and trying to catch books moving slow.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2002, 02:41 AM
neilm neilm is offline
Two Star General
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,676
Default

I've talked to a BM about this and at some point will research it.

My assertion is that buyback at the closing # is profitable, he says it isn't.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2002, 02:54 AM
Picksix Picksix is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,336
Default

If getting Steam at the the original price is a winner, and buying back at the closing number is a winner, how sweet it is in the middle.

[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2002, 04:27 AM
Pancho Sanza Pancho Sanza is offline
Three Star General
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,931
Default

Its not profitable in the NBA, at least it wasn't last year.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2002, 05:01 AM
GottaWinToday GottaWinToday is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,453
Default

THIS ONE SOUNDS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. EVERYONE WOULD DO THIS, TRUELY THE LAZY MANS SYSTEM.................

This would Don Best, out of business......

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2002, 05:37 AM
KingOfTheSquares KingOfTheSquares is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,483
Default

The good thing about using a numeric system to rate the teams is: the steam can move the number into your bound to make a pick...and while I have not tracked this, it seems to usually be a good thing.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2002, 06:27 AM
Holy Bull Holy Bull is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,746
Default



<< THIS ONE SOUNDS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. EVERYONE WOULD DO THIS, TRUELY THE LAZY MANS SYSTEM.................

This would Don Best, out of business......
>>



I'm not referring to just betting the closing numbers blindly. I'm speaking more in terms of finding a subset where you think the tail end of
steam is vulnerable. Some of these NBA totals for example move 5 or 6 points. Its just hard for me to believe that there is no value in the
buy back alone after such a drastic move.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2002, 02:44 PM
neilm neilm is offline
Two Star General
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,676
Default

One thing that must be factored in is why did the line move?

If its injury, weather etc. then there is little value in playing the closing number in that it has these factors in the closing line, that may have changed from teh opener.

However in a game where nothing changes materially except the line, the larger the move the more liklihood that it has overshot its target.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2002, 03:02 PM
alysheba88 alysheba88 is offline
Three Star General
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 13,625
Default

What about the steam success rate on the closing number? Not buying back?

Would think like anything that those that get in at the "top" of the market get the worst of it. Is that the case?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2002, 03:27 AM
GottaWinToday GottaWinToday is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,453
Default

Sometimes "steam" is corrupted, if "steam" means there is sharp money going down......I think we all know this in this forum but at the book, just before the game starts the gamblers there react in putting the money down.......

It's just fun to remember these things.......

I remember a guy putting down 22K on an obscure Knicks NBA game just before tipoff.........It was all in the open at the book so everyone there knew this just happened and we had a run on that bet........And all it was, was a runner laying off for back east or whatever, had nothing to do with the Knicks winning but everyone in the book went wild, thought it was sharp money......

Another one was an Asian, I think Chinese, put 28K on an obscure baseball game MLB and the same thing happened, everyone thought we had something here. Turned out this was a layoff bet also and did not have much to do with who won or lost..........

It was very interesting in Vegas, I might go back, I miss it a little.............

Didn't add much to the tread but I had fun remembering............Oh yes, and NO TIP........


GottaWinToday
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2002, 04:12 PM
The Actuary The Actuary is offline
Five Star General
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 20,222
Default

Bull,

Some qualifications,

1)Second half of the season
2)Not news/injury related
3)If the steam is on a fav. or over
I think this would be a good start.

TA
__________________
In 1998 the Department of Justice brought charges under the Wire Act against 22 American citizens involved in managing foreign-based sites. "You can’t hide online," Janet Reno, the attorney-general, warned Internet betting operators, "and you can’t hide offshore."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Please be advised that if you are wagering over the internet, this is illegal in many jurisdictions. A wagering site may be operating legally at their location but it may still be illegal for you to wager from your location. We suggest you check on the legal situation from any jurisdiction in which you may wager.
 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6