BETCRIS 5DIMES ACTION ON SPORTS BETPHOENIX.COM BODOG BOOKMAKER.COM HOLLYWOOD SPORTSBOOK INTERTOPS RACEBOOK SPORTSBETTING.COM WSEX
ONLINE SPORTSBOOKS Banner -<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://www.majorwager.com/adserver/adclick.php?bannerid=92&amp;zoneid=1&amp;source=&amp;dest=http%3A%2F%2Fsports.bodog.com%2Fwelcome%2F1404439%2F&amp;ismap='>Online Sports Betting</a>at Bodog Sportsbook

Go Back   MajorWager Forums > MW - Online Sportsbooks > Handicapping "Think Tank"
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Handicapping "Think Tank" technical handicapping and statistics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2002, 06:55 PM
parlayin parlayin is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,592
Default 3.5 and 7.5 Football Lines

Anybody have records on how 3.5 and 7.5 favorites have done in both NCAA and NFL? Since books don't really want to move off key numbers, would it make sense that if they did spot the hook (to entice dog bettors), favorites at these numbers would cover at a decent rate? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2002, 07:30 PM
count zero count zero is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: marin county california
Posts: 4,365
Default

Using CSW data, I get the following ATS results (unverified) for the NFL since 1983:

Favs by 3.5: 157-177 47.0% (Home 101-116, Road 56-61)
Favs by 7.5: 064-059 52.0% (Home 039-041, Road 25-18)
__________________
I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my grandfather. Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2002, 06:26 AM
pokerjoe pokerjoe is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,935
Default

Right off, I have a problem with such attempted precision at saying what the line was. As we all know, there is no single "line." There's the open, the publicly available open, the close, and points in between. And almost always, it's "3-20, 3.5" or "3.5, 4" and so on.

I think reading the line is still best kept intuitive. If most books have it 3.5 most of the week, but it settles on 3 at the finish, maybe that's exactly what they wanted: to suck dog money out of the market, meaning, the week-long 3.5 was an indicator of favorite strength. OTOH, if it opened across the board 7, and it's a MNF game that goes up to 7.5 just pre-game, then maybe it just reflects squares betting faves money.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2002, 07:20 PM
KingOfTheSquares KingOfTheSquares is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,483
Default

...folks need to get a grip on the fact that a market is open for roughly a week before an NFL game...and the price moves like prices on the stock market. Where we have a difference is, except for interactives, market stops at game start, and for the interactives, at game end.

What I'm always surprised at is: how little movement there has been in the NFL "market" over the years. I attribute this to the fact that there are very astute lines makers in the NFL (and perhaps the consistancy of the sport).
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2002, 01:04 PM
GM GM is offline
Private 1st Class
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 55
Default

I also believe, as pokerjoe mentioned, that this is difficult to measure due to the fact it's hard to determine which line exactly to use.

However, I've been keeping my own stats on various CLOSING lines for a few years now (lines used come from covers.com data), for every half point increment. I can tell you that from one year to the next there are very few patterns at ANY of the half point increments. However, patterns emerge when you break it into larger, logical groups. IE. I keep track of games that went off at Pick, 1 to 2½ pts, exactly 3 pts, 3½ to 6½ pts, exactly 7 pts, 7½ to 9½ pts, 10 to 13½ pts, and 14+ pts. These categories provide something a little more meaningful. I use 3 and 7 in their own categories because of the importance of these numbers.

The following data, for what it's worth applies to NFL only (no college, CFL, or anything else) and is my own personal count....

Favorites of exactly 3½ points at close:
2001: 4-4 ATS @ home, 2-5 ATS on the road
2000: 10-9 ATS @ home, 1-2 ATS on the road
1999: 6-7 ATS @ home, 5-3 ATS on the road
1998: 2-3 ATS @ home, 2-2 ATS on the road
1997: 5-5 ATS @ home, 1-6 ATS on the road
1996: 4-7 ATS @ home, 1-2 ATS on the road
Overall: 31-35 ATS @ home, 12-20 ATS on the road.

If anything, that says take a home dog getting 3½.

Expanding this:
Favorites of 3½ to 6½ points, at close:
I won't bore you with the year-by-year breakdown (too much typing!)....but I can tell you over this 6-year period, they have gone 154-181 ATS @ home (46.0%), and 60-81 ATS on the road (42.6%). Now THAT'S data I like. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img] A word of caution though....in 2001 Fav's in this range went 39-38 (home and road combined), and the year before it was 38-41. Maybe the linemaker has already adjusted for this? Take these last two years out and you had a KILLER dog cover rate.

.................................................. .........................

Favorites of exactly 7½ points at close:
2001: 2-3, 2-1
2000: 2-3, 2-0
1999: 4-1, 0-0
1998: 3-0, 1-2
1997: 2-3, 0-2
1996: 0-3, 0-1
Overall: 13-13 ATS @ home, 5-6 ATS on the road.

Very small sample size, not meaningful in my opinion.

Expanding it:
Favorites of 7½ to 9½ points, at close:
Over 6 years, have gone 56-68 ATS @ home (45.2%), and 16-22 ATS on the road (42.1%). This trend has NOT tailed off like the one above. 10-16 ATS home and road combined last year (38.5%), and 9-17 the prior season (34.6%!).

Probably a lot more info than you wanted....but some nice numbers in there!

GM
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Please be advised that if you are wagering over the internet, this is illegal in many jurisdictions. A wagering site may be operating legally at their location but it may still be illegal for you to wager from your location. We suggest you check on the legal situation from any jurisdiction in which you may wager.
 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6