TA:
Obviously, like we've been discussing, it would clearly be a more conservative staking. Totally agree that there's a big difference when calculating odds on a closed system (coin flips, blackjack run on a super-computer) where replacement or true independent trials are part of the equation. Compare that to sports betting, where no matter how good you are, you're still banking on some pretty heavy assumptions.
Regarding my answer above, I have to admit that I'm a pretty conservative player. The idea of tapping out an allocated bankroll is much more foul than the positive ramifications of turning over a tidy profit. Just my outlook on things. I could see how someone else would rationally be willing to risk bigger %s.
__________________
"Dan Marino? What did he play...kickball?"
|