View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2002, 12:25 AM
Machiavelli Machiavelli is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,189
Default



<< I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more attention. >>

I don't believe many people even view this forum. 88 views, and each person can multiple view's count multiple times (so 5 to 10 of them are probably mine).

<< It'd be interesting to see what would happen if you posted on a public forum, or gave to WSEX. >>

I am leaning towards just posting them here. I would have no control over the information if I gave it to a select group, and I wouldn't want to upset anyone for excluding them from the group.

<< WSEX knowledge would make the market prices close enough to the "true prices" that profitable opportunities would become very rare. >>

Yes and no. I believe the everyday value that I was able to reap over the course of the baseball season might disappear unless someone enhances my method, but in certain events it is my sense that the prices are highly influenced by square action. Monday night football, any game involving the Rams (maybe not anymore), postseason baseball, and the NBA playoffs are all examples. At WSEX, I am only inferring this through my 75 share orders being filled for more than the standard 50 shares at WSEX. At tradesports, I can see other people's limit orders and they confirm my suspicions.

<< Your methods probably aren't completely formulaic >>

They definitely aren't. In football, I insist that any sim or formula would have to be highly advanced if it is going to be used, there are too many subtleties.
That is the other issue with release of my baseball methods. There is a pretty major "leap of logic" in there, which many people might have objections with. I believe I mentioned it to you at the MW convention (reminder hint: geometric series).
Reply With Quote