That being said, I am making no claims to handicapping proficiency there, and perhaps you are right, i.e. if I can be ahead just a little bit, as one piece of anecdotal evidence (which, of course, could change next week
), surely others could as well? I just want to know why you hold this opinion.
Obviously baseball at 10c is a more attractive proposition, obviously no argument there, but unbeatable?
Betting gurus out there could probably beat anything, would not matter what it was I would think.
Now, if baseball is intrinsically 'harder' then your 'smart' population should, if the lines were the same value, win less on that than anything else? Does this hold up at the bookmaker's end? Is the return on baseball theoretically higher than it should be compared to basketball or hockey (which is also pretty much pick the winner) let alone rugby league, rugby union, tennis, footy, golf, motor racing matchups, or whatever. (taking into account of course, the 10c baseball line wherever)