[alec]

I second what pokerjoe said.

Is it comical or something? I watched a show on Fox on Saturday (I think), "In line" or "On line" or something like that. The host of the show fits the profile that pokerjoe described perfectly. But the scary thing is: she is a former prosecutor.

And she had another prosecutor on her show. They listened to some 5 year old Karr's phone records, where he talks some nonsense about being able to see through the eyes of the killer.

She asked that other prosecutor guy: "So do you believe he may be guilty?" And he replied: "Oh, absolutely. These records are just chilling. And don't forget that S.B.T.C. thing."

How can such people even become prosecutors?

And what about the media? I listened to another Fox guy, Gibson, I think. Some professor in Boston said that the attention that the media paid to this case was embarrassing. And Gibson explained that it is not only not embarrassing, but it is the most natural thing for the media to do. Why? Because the case involves a child. And there is nothing more important for any parent than to protect his child from pedophiles and therefore everybody wants to learn how a pedophile's mind works.

Does it get any more ridiculous than that?