Quote:
Originally Posted by nostaw1952 
A couple of things:
1) In another thread, an example of somebody who was "brilliant" but troubled, to say the least: Anthrax Suspect Commits Suicide - AOL News
Again, I don't concede for a second that the Nutty Racist is brilliant, mind you, but even if he WAS, that doesn't mean he's is "excused" from being a loon. See how that works?
2) You babbled about me citing "specific examples" to support my claims, now I've done so, and it's met with stony silence for a couple of days; what's the matter, Motormouth, no snappy comeback, no pithy rejoinder? Cat got your crotch? I wonder why...
__________________________________________________ ___________________
The biggest choke in the history of sports, your 2004…NEW...YORK...YANKEES!!! |
I happened to be away for a few days, having a great time. I find it ammusing that you actually think your reprinting the slander of a neo-con liar and discredited idealouge like James Kirchick gave me cause to not respond? That's funny. If you read my initial response, i question if your deducement of Paul being a racist was from the "socialist clown" that wrote a propoganda hit piece on him that was discredited. So what do you do to strengthen your view? You reprint the very article that I said had no merit to begin with. That shows you to be what we all have concluded, that your just a sheep, following the herd, with no valid points of your own. James Kirchick is a joke, he is an admitted homo and sexual degenerate, who is nothing more than a blabbering apologists for neo-conservatives (ala- William Kristol, also a Paul basher). This kid is 25 years old, and is nothing more than a pathetic soundboard for the Bush gang of Roman Empire wannabes and Cartel criminals.
You can find countless sites that have exposed that article for what it was, just a pack of lies and misinformation and slander. I asked you to produce any video or audio evidence of Ron Paul being a racist. Naturally, you could not produce anything. Shouldn't be hard to find something if he is what you say he is, considering he has been in the public eye for 35+ years. But of course, you can produce nothing but reprinting a discredited hit piece by a moral degenerate and neo-con apologist Kirchick.
And it amazes that you print this idiots attempt to be sarcastic, and you actually take it as verbatim without fact checking. Do some research, find out who was placed in high posts for Armament contracts in WWI. Find all the connections from 1895-present. Find out who financed the Bolshevik revolution. Read Smedley Butler's book from the '30s. You can get biograhical information from unbiased sources and connect dots pretty easily. All it takes is some hard work, some common sense, and the ability to think for yourself. But since you probably lack all 3 of those traits, It's probably a waste of time to engage in any dialouge with a zombie like you. So since you cannot produce anything of substance to confirm any of your childish slurs, maybe you should stop boring everyone with your kindergarten style antics.