View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2008, 12:12 PM
StarnetGypsy StarnetGypsy is offline
Three Star General
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miles From Nowhere, USA
Posts: 10,121
Default

Quote:
From GlobalPolicy.org:

(June 9, 2006)
Iraqi Minister for Foreign Affairs Hoshyar Zebari has requested that the Security Council extend the mandate of the Multinational Force (MNF) in Iraq, due for review in June. In a letter addressed to the President of the Council, Zebari thanked the MNF for its assistance in “providing security and stability in Iraq.” Under Resolution 1637 (2005), the UN Security Council can terminate the force’s mandate at any time if Iraq’s government asks it to do so.

Full Article - Letter from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Iraq to the United Nations - UN Security Council Global - Policy Forum

(June 9, 2008)
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki sought to reassure Iran over a planned security pact with Washington on Sunday, vowing that Iraq would never be used as a platform to attack the Islamic Republic. "We will not allow Iraq to become a platform for harming the security of Iran and neighbors," Maliki said after a late-night meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki in Tehran.

Full Article - Maliki Vows Deal With US Will Not Be Used Against Iranian Neighbors - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum
al-Maliki met recently with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who is the Supreme Leader of Iran. Pretty clear from the footage that al-Maliki is working closely with the Ayatollah to maintain a strong relationship with Iran. From a political standpoint it makes perfectly good sense since they're neighbors, not to mention al-Maliki has been pushing a Shiite agenda and overruling his parliamentary ministers.

Seems to me he's on course with Iran in attempting to eventually form a government similar to Iran's, in that it has a parliament, but is chiefly ruled by the religious leaders (Ayatollahs & Mullas). I've felt this was inevitable since the beginning of the war ... Islam is the core of their society.

And now the Bush/Cheney administration is pushing what is apparently unreasonable demands that would give the US full autonomy. Not sure why since we're not told much, but I'd imagine the thrust would be to allow the US an extended military presence in the region, similar to our forces in South Korea, so that we could attack Iran/Syria at any given moment?

The longer this draws out without resolution, the more it's going to effect our presidential election process. Bad, very bad, in that it's giving another country a controlling influence in our political process. I can't imagine the Whitehouse pressing this at this time, unless they think it will benefit their preferred presidential candidate, can you Seeka?

On the other hand, it may backfire and play right into the hands of Obama's intended policy of negotiating a withdrawal.

At any rate, this is all over my head, but I'm going to watch it, intently, because it could be the precursor to a wider war. pfftt! Especially if Ehud Olmert, the Israeli PM, launches a unilateral attack on Iran's nuclear reactors ....
__________________
no matter where you go, there you are ...
“When you win, nothing hurts.”
- Joe Namath


Gyps


It's about priorities.
Reply With Quote