Quote:
|
Major...terrorists don't need to launder anything. They're not afraid of getting arrested for ill-gotten gains. Offshore financial vehicles that aren't regulated would be a very convenient way for a terrorist organization to move money to its cells. It doesn't need to be a million dollars for the projects they put together. Not saying that this is happening now. It's clearly something that governments have a right to be concerned about because of the potential. The article was about what terrorism has to do with sports betting. Laundering is more of an organized crime issue than a terrorism issue I believe.
|
Blogguy, by reading your posts I realize that you are one of the ones that bought into the Terrorism bullshit. Shame, I would have thought you could see past the rhetoric. Either you have no clue how international finance works or you drank the cool-aid.
Let me re-word your comments for you. It would be easier for a terrorist to go to Las Vegas and get the needed funds, untraceable, than it would be for them to do it via present and previous online gaming processing systems.
Also, laundering is no longer an "organized crime" issue, that’s more rhetoric, Blogguy. The DOJ uses money laundering charges like a 70 year old man pops Viagra. It has no exclusivity to organized crime anymore.
By making these arguments you are in fact part of the problem, not the solution. In order to fight the USG on these issues it will take public awareness but most of all public correctness, and what you are speaking of simply is not factual or correct in any way shape or form.
Dont lets yourself become another Jonestowner. Just because the DOJ says the sky is pink doesnt mean you have to argue it isnt. There is no argument with incorrect facts. Simply a correction of the facts.
Best debate I have seen on this site in years!!!!!